What changed, after on-shore dialing.

Seven engagements where the math went the other way. Real estate agents working expireds, FSBOs and FRBOs, plus B2B teams replacing offshore vendors and AI bots. Outcomes, the objections we had to overcome to get hired, and what specifically changed once a senior on-shore caller picked up the list.

Industry case studies

Before and after numbers, dial volume, connect rates, cost per meeting, and the compliance controls used on each program.

Residential real estate · Top-producing agent·Client under NDA·Anonymized engagement

From 4 expired re-lists a year to 19, by replacing a script bot with a senior on-shore caller

Company type
Real estate agent business. Client profile withheld under NDA.
ICP
Client-owned prospect and customer records.
The problem

Team had run an AI dialer for 14 months. 0 re-lists attributed to it, sellers complaining about robocalls, and the team's caller-ID was flagged spam-likely on two carriers. Lead agent was personally calling expireds at 9pm.

What was tried before

Two AI voice-agent products, a Mojo dialer with a junior in-house ISA, and a Filipino VA pulling lists from a paid expired feed. The ISA quit after 4 months. The AI bot got 23 complaints in 6 weeks. The VA list was stale by the time the calls went out.

Campaign setup

Two senior North American callers in the team's time zone, dialing fresh expireds within 24 hours of list pull. Buyer-first opener approved by the team lead. DNC scrubbing, call recordings, and warm transfers into the dashboard the same night.

What changed

Pulled the AI bot, rotated to clean STIR/SHAKEN numbers in the local area code, and put a senior on-shore caller on the list inside 24 hours of expiration. Opener rewritten around a real buyer the team had on the bench.

Outcomes
19
expired re-lists closed in 12 months (up from 4)
$5.7M
additional listing volume attributed
82%
listing-appointment show rate
0.4%
spam-likely rate, down from 38%
Call volume
1,800 dials per month across expireds and FSBOs
Connect rate
27 percent connect rate on fresh expireds, 31 percent on FSBOs
Meetings booked
34 listing appointments in 6 months, 28 held
Buyer feedback
Sellers consistently said it was the first call that did not lead with 'I see your listing expired.' Three sellers asked specifically for the caller by name when they finally listed.

“I stopped calling expireds at 9pm in month two. By month six, the callers were booking more listing appointments than my whole team had run the year before. The dashboard is the only outbound tool we still keep.”

, anonymized client
Residential real estate · Solo agent·Client under NDA·Anonymized engagement

Solo agent broke into FRBO and turned 11 tired landlords into seller clients in a year

Company type
Real estate agent business. Client profile withheld under NDA.
ICP
Client-owned prospect and customer records.
The problem

Agent was farming the area with mailers (1.1 percent conversion at $9K/yr) and door-knocking on Saturdays. FRBO was the most-discussed list at every coaching call and the least-worked list in the market. No bandwidth to run a 12-month nurture personally.

What was tried before

Mailers, door knocking, two failed VA hires (offshore, both quit inside 60 days), and a brief experiment with a Filipino-based call centre that the agent killed in week three after landlord complaints.

Campaign setup

One senior on-shore caller assigned, working a FRBO pull from Zillow Rentals, Craigslist, and Facebook Marketplace every morning. Two-question screener to identify tired landlords. 12-month nurture cadence tracked in the dashboard.

What changed

Switched to a single senior North American caller with a tired-landlord screener instead of a listing pitch. Calls recorded, warm leads scored on seller-readiness, callbacks queued for 6 to 12 months out automatically.

Outcomes
11
FRBO listings signed in 12 months
$3.9M
listing volume created from a zero-listing source
10x
ROI vs prior mailer spend
Call volume
1,200 dials per month
Connect rate
32 percent connect rate, landlords answer rental ads
Meetings booked
22 listing consultations, 18 held, 11 listings signed inside 12 months
Buyer feedback
Landlords said the caller sounded like a neighbour. The two-question screener (tenant working out, plan to hold or sell) was repeatedly mentioned as the moment they decided to talk.

“FRBO was the list everyone talked about at coaching and nobody actually worked. Once I had a real caller on it, the listings showed up. I am keeping this running until I retire.”

, anonymized client
Cybersecurity · Series B·Client under NDA·Anonymized engagement

From a stalled offshore pilot to 38 enterprise meetings in a quarter

Company type
Cybersecurity business. Client profile withheld under NDA.
ICP
Relevant business decision-makers matched to the client’s offer.
The problem

Offshore vendor booked 60 meetings in 90 days. Only 14 prospects showed up, and the AE team disqualified 11 of those on the first call. CFO froze the SDR budget.

What was tried before

12 months of offshore SDRs, two AI cold-email tools (Apollo sequences and Clay-driven personalization), and a homegrown LinkedIn automation. Email reply rate sat at 0.3 percent. AI-personalized opens were strong but replies collapsed inside week three.

Campaign setup

Two senior on-shore reps, one pod lead, weekly QA against recordings. List rebuilt to 1,200 named accounts with verified direct dials. Calling windows tuned to buyer time zones in PT, MT, CT, and ET.

What changed

We rebuilt the ICP around CISOs at 200 to 1,500 employee mid-market. Switched to North American senior reps in the buyer's time zone, with a peer-level opener referencing the prospect's specific compliance posture.

Outcomes
38
qualified meetings booked in Q1
84%
meeting show rate (vs 23% prior)
11
opportunities into pipeline
$1.9M
qualified pipeline created
Call volume
5,400 dials in Q1 across both reps
Connect rate
27 percent connect rate to direct numbers
Meetings booked
38 qualified meetings, 32 held
Buyer feedback
CISOs repeatedly mentioned that the opener referenced their actual compliance posture (SOC 2 stage, HIPAA scope) instead of generic pain. Two prospects asked for the rep to be involved in the AE call because they trusted the framing.

“The shift from offshore to on-shore was like turning the lights on. Same list, completely different conversations. Our AEs stopped complaining about junk meetings within two weeks.”

, anonymized client
Healthcare IT · Growth-stage·Client under NDA·Anonymized engagement

Cracked the COO buyer at regional health systems after twelve months of dead email

Company type
Healthcare IT business. Client profile withheld under NDA.
ICP
Relevant business decision-makers matched to the client’s offer.
The problem

0.4 percent email reply rate across 14 months. Calendar dropped to 4 discovery calls per month. Board questioning whether outbound headcount was justified at all.

What was tried before

Two AI SDR platforms (one well-known sequencer, one autonomous AI SDR), a healthcare-focused list vendor, and a six-month content campaign on LinkedIn. Inbound stayed flat. Outbound replies trended down each quarter.

Campaign setup

Two on-shore senior reps assigned to 180 named health systems. Buying-committee map for each account with COO, CMIO, and CFO. Three opener frames tested: staffing burnout, EHR friction, post-acute readmission penalty.

What changed

We mapped the buying committee at 180 target health systems, isolated direct dials for COO and CMIO, and built a calling plan around three frames: staffing burnout, EHR friction, and the post-acute readmission penalty.

Outcomes
27
discovery calls in first 90 days
78%
show rate
9
advanced to RFP or pilot
2.4x
pipeline created vs prior quarter
Call volume
3,800 dials in 90 days
Connect rate
24 percent connect rate, higher with COO direct mobile lines
Meetings booked
27 discovery calls, 21 held
Buyer feedback
COOs said the readmission-penalty opener felt like the rep had read their last board update. Two CMIOs forwarded the rep internally to their CIO without being asked.

“We had spent fourteen months telling ourselves the buyer just wasn't on email. The phone proved that in three weeks. The COO conversations would never have happened any other way.”

, anonymized client
Commercial real estate · Brokerage·Client under NDA·Anonymized engagement

Replaced a 6-person in-house cold-calling team with a 2-pod on-shore model

Company type
Commercial real estate business. Client profile withheld under NDA.
ICP
Relevant business decision-makers matched to the client’s offer.
The problem

In-house team of six SDRs averaged $11K cost per booked tour, 31 percent show rate, and 90 percent annual turnover. Senior brokers refused to take meetings the team booked.

What was tried before

Three rounds of in-house SDR hiring, an outbound dialer rollout, and a brief experiment with an AI voicemail-drop tool. None solved tour quality. The dialer increased volume but show rate dropped further.

Campaign setup

Two on-shore pods (4 reps total) replaced the 6-person in-house team. Triggers built around lease expirations, capex announcements, and headcount changes pulled from public filings. Tours qualified by use case and timeline before booking.

What changed

Two senior on-shore pods replaced the in-house team. We rebuilt the calling plan around occupancy triggers, lease rolls, and CapEx events. Tours were qualified by use-case and timeline before booking.

Outcomes
$3.2K
cost per booked tour (down from $11K)
82%
tour show rate
44%
tour-to-LOI conversion
$680K
first-year commission attributed
Call volume
9,200 dials per quarter across both pods
Connect rate
31 percent connect rate to office and operations leaders
Meetings booked
56 tours booked in Q1, 46 held
Buyer feedback
Tenants said the rep sounded like a local broker, not a call center. Several mentioned they took the call specifically because the opener referenced their lease end date correctly.

“The senior brokers will actually take the meetings now. That alone is worth what we pay. The cost-per-tour line item is the part the CFO points at.”

, anonymized client
B2B SaaS · Series A·Client under NDA·Anonymized engagement

First nine logos closed inside ninety days of kickoff

Company type
B2B SaaS business. Client profile withheld under NDA.
ICP
Relevant business decision-makers matched to the client’s offer.
The problem

Founder personally took every demo. Board wanted proof the motion was repeatable before approving a $200K AE hire. No outbound process existed.

What was tried before

Two AI SDR tools (one for email, one for LinkedIn DMs), $14K spent on PPC over six weeks, and a referral-only motion. Demos came in but conversion was inconsistent and demand was unpredictable month to month.

Campaign setup

Working session refined ICP from 'mid-market everywhere' to the precise RevOps persona. Two-rep on-shore pod, 400 named accounts, founder only joined qualified discoveries.

What changed

Working session refined the ICP from 'mid-market everywhere' to 'Director of RevOps at 200 to 800-employee SaaS companies on Salesforce.' Two-rep pod ran the calling plan; founder only joined qualified discoveries.

Outcomes
47
qualified discoveries in 90 days
9
logos closed
$340K
ARR booked
Day 41
first closed-won
Call volume
4,100 dials in 90 days
Connect rate
29 percent connect rate to Director and VP RevOps
Meetings booked
47 qualified discoveries, 41 held
Buyer feedback
RevOps leaders consistently said they took the call because the rep named a specific Salesforce object pain point in the opener. Three buyers told the founder they would not have replied to email but were happy to talk live.

“I went from being the cold caller to being the closer in six weeks. The pod did the work I hated and put me only in front of meetings I could actually close.”

, anonymized client
Construction tech · Mid-market·Client under NDA·Anonymized engagement

Reactivated 220 dormant target accounts after an offshore vendor burned them

Company type
Construction tech business. Client profile withheld under NDA.
ICP
Relevant business decision-makers matched to the client’s offer.
The problem

Previous 18-month offshore engagement touched every named account 6 plus times with poor outcomes. Caller ID flagged as spam-likely on three carriers. Sales team had written off the entire 220-account list as 'cooked.'

What was tried before

Offshore SDR vendor, two paid LinkedIn campaigns, and an email warming service to try to recover deliverability. None of it brought accounts back. The list sat untouched for 4 months before this engagement.

Campaign setup

Caller-ID rotation and warm-up over two weeks. New on-shore reps reintroduced the brand with a candid 'we know our last call was not great' opener, then led with one insight relevant to the prospect's project pipeline.

What changed

Caller-ID rotation and warm-up over two weeks. New on-shore reps reintroduced the brand with a candid 'we know our last call wasn't great' opener and led with a single insight relevant to the prospect's project pipeline.

Outcomes
31
previously-burned accounts re-engaged
12
advanced to discovery
0.4%
spam-likely rate (down from 38%)
$1.1M
reactivated pipeline
Call volume
2,600 dials over 90 days into the previously burned list
Connect rate
22 percent connect rate after caller-ID warm-up (up from 4 percent)
Meetings booked
31 accounts re-engaged, 12 advanced to discovery
Buyer feedback
Several prospects said they appreciated the honest acknowledgment of the prior bad experience. Two operations VPs said it was the first time a vendor had owned a mistake instead of pretending it never happened.

“I had written off that list. Watching it come back to life was the most surprising part of the engagement. The on-shore voice plus the honest opener did the work.”

, anonymized client
Request a callback

Pick a call block, drop your email, a senior caller is in your market this week.

Get a callback from a partner
Request